[pycrypto] Build error, 2.6.1

Martin Falatic martin at falatic.com
Sat Sep 16 10:35:34 UTC 2017


No problem... I just started looking at this but it sounds like you already got it sorted. Sounds like either a missing dependency or install conflict was to blame there.


On September 16, 2017 12:35:26 AM PDT, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson at gmail.com> wrote:
>Now resolved (again?).
>The similarity of names and what needs to be changed seems to be the
>source of my problems?
>
>Sorry to waste bandwidth.
>
>On 15 September 2017 at 19:21, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson at gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> New (Windows 10) machine.
>> installed python  3.6.2
>> pip install pycryptodomex
>> SelfTest ran fine.
>>
>> Tried the examples at
>https://www.pycryptodome.org/en/latest/src/examples.html
>>
>>
>> C:\Users\Dave Pawson>python
>> Python 3.6.2 (v3.6.2:5fd33b5, Jul  8 2017, 04:57:36) [MSC v.1900 64
>> bit (AMD64)] on win32
>> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more
>information.
>>>>> from Crypto.Cipher import AES
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
>> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'Crypto'
>>>>> from Crypto.Random import get_random_bytes
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
>> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'Crypto'
>>
>>
>>
>> Are they out of date please Martin?
>>
>> regards
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22 July 2017 at 09:38, Martin Falatic <martin at falatic.com> wrote:
>>> Not sure about the error you got, but generally if you are
>installing things
>>> directly into Linux system library areas you'll need root / sudo to
>do it.
>>> I'm surprised that didn't come up with pycrypto, but it might be an
>artifact
>>> of other install attempts.
>>>
>>> If in doubt, that sounds like good info for an issue on the github
>issue
>>> tracker for pycryptodome.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017-07-22 00:44, Dave Pawson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> pip uninstalled pycrypto!
>>>>
>>>> Re install instructions. Fedora 26, requires root for installation?
>>>>
>>>> running install_lib
>>>>     copying build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.6/Cryptodome/__init__.py ->
>>>> /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/Cryptodome
>>>>     error: could not delete
>>>> '/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/Cryptodome/__init__.py':
>>>> Permission denied
>>>>
>>>> Not mentioned on
>>>> https://www.pycryptodome.org/en/latest/src/installation.html
>>>>
>>>>>  python3 -m Cryptodome.SelfTest
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>> Ran 22656 tests in 37.023s
>>>>
>>>> Tks
>>>>
>>>> On 22 July 2017 at 08:34, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson at gmail.com>
>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Having installed pycrypto, is the only way to remove it to find
>the
>>>>> files and remove manually?
>>>>>
>>>>> (groan) - or will pycryptodome run alongside pycrypto please?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tia
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21 July 2017 at 20:21, Martin Falatic <martin at falatic.com>
>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As this project hasn't seen commits on master (or perhaps any
>branch) in
>>>>>> over three years, it appears to be dead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, pycryptodome is alive and well! It's a fork off the
>latest
>>>>>> pycrypto
>>>>>> and contains many bugfixes, enhancements. Most importantly, it's
>an
>>>>>> ongoing
>>>>>> project.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/Legrandin/pycryptodome
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.pycryptodome.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are two ways to install it: for a seamless experience I
>recommend
>>>>>> uninstalling pycrypto (if present) and installing pycryptodome.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (pycryptodomex has its uses for some, but would mean editing your
>>>>>> imports,
>>>>>> whereas pycryptodome is a drop-in replacement for pycrypto.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have issues with installing or using pycryptodome, there
>are
>>>>>> resources there to guide you and an active issue tracker as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good luck!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  - Marty
>>>>>>    www.falatic.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2017-07-21 07:16, Dave Pawson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Installing on a new system, Fedora 26, 64 bit.
>>>>>>> Builds OK using setup.py for python 2.7
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fails on python 3.x?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should this be built in a different way please?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TiA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dave Pawson
>>>>> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
>>>>> Docbook FAQ.
>>>>> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Pawson
>> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
>> Docbook FAQ.
>> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>
>
>
>-- 
>Dave Pawson
>XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
>Docbook FAQ.
>http://www.dpawson.co.uk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dlitz.net/pipermail/pycrypto/attachments/20170916/9e0c7f3d/attachment.html>


More information about the pycrypto mailing list